Day 1.0: Putting Inquiry at the Center

MarkLakePic

A beautiful start to our first full day on the mountain!

Team Shields/Crests – Represent Your Why!

As a team, colleges developed their shared understanding, their shared mission, and created a “college crest/shield” that represents that work, and the crest game was strong!

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

San Diego Continuing Ed.: the wolf pack. Work collaboratively for a stronger group. Oooowwwwwww!

Wolf Howl

To help develop a shared understanding for Guided Pathways, Chaffey College is using the children’s book Ming Lo Moves the Mountain.

MingLo


Shared Inquiry Questions and Discussion Groups

Despite the different foci of each college’s plan, it became clear that there were questions/concerns in common across all colleges. We distilled these shared areas of understanding into three inquiry questions:

  • What do we know about how people learn, and how do we transform our institutions to reflect that understanding?
  • How do we authentically engage all stakeholders and collaborate across siloes?
  • How do we meaningfully include students in our transformation efforts?

Appreciative Inquiry

Traditionally, we spend more time planning and acting than building relationships. However, this means that efforts are not often maintained in the long run. Through Appreciative Inquiry (AI) it becomes clear that building relationships is fundamental to long-term change, and we should be spending most of our time on relationships. This then helps effect transformational change, making planning and action take less time and effort.

Traditional processes often have change effort priorities flipped, under serving areas that are vital to sustainable and transformational change.

Traditional processes often have change effort priorities flipped, under serving areas that are vital to sustainable and transformational change.

Organizations are, first and foremost, centers of human relatedness, and relationships come alive where there is an appreciative eye, when people see the best in one another and the whole, when they share their dreams and ultimate concerns in affirming ways, and when they are connected in full voice to create not just new worlds, but better worlds. By making it possible for every voice to be heard, a life giving process is enacted. — from The Appreciative Organization by Harlene Anderson, David Cooperrider, et. al.


Inquiry Question Brainstorming – What We Know and What We Want to Learn

Looking at the shared inquiry questions, participants reflected on their own knowledge and inquiry questions around each of the three focal points.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

One point made was that our most meaningful moments of engagement with other faculty is at the “water cooler.” This is a growing point of inquiry for many faculty members. How do we create meaningful interactions with our peers that foster learning? This piece from The Chronicle of Higher Education is a recent reflection on that question.

Professors-Want-Intellectual-Community.-If-Only-They-Had-the-Time.-The-Chronicle-of-Higher-Education (1)

Inquiry Questions Debrief

After about 2 hour breakout groups, participants dove into one of those key inquiry questions and interacted with key texts around that question. During the discussion, groups identified knowledge they have around that question (what we know) and further points of inquiry and opportunities for learning (what we need to know).

This slideshow requires JavaScript.


Wenger, Trayner, and de Laat – Communities and Networks

Central to our (the) idea of transformational change is the concept of communities of practice. Communities of practice are comprised of two important factors:

participation-and-reification-graphic

The participation part is our work–the most important work–toward the change of institutions. As Wenger et al note, this is through the work of communities and networks:

Wenger et al p. 9

Wenger et al p. 9

Through the work toward your success initiative, it is necessary to engage these areas for deep learning. To account for and measure the effect of this participatory work, Wenger et al note that networks and communities have stories that record their interactions:

As human experiences that evolve over time, communities and networks have stories – how they started, what has happened since, what participants are trying to achieve. It is in the context of these narratives that one can appreciate what learning is taking place (or not) and what value is created (or not).

These narratives are comprised of two pieces: the ground narrative and the aspirational narrative. It is the “the tension between these two narratives creates a space for learning and for deciding what is worth learning” (17).

Illustration of the tension between the two narratives.

Illustration of the tension between the two narratives.

 

Another common thread that developed today was the dangers of community and networks. As Wenger, Trayner, and de Laat put it:

The danger of community is that it can become hostage to its history, its established ways of doing things, and the attendant identification with the group. When that happens, communities can become closed and inward-focused; boundaries stiff and impermeable; and past successes a blinder to new possibilities.

The danger of network is noise and diffusion. Connectivity as a learning resource has its price. Expanding connectivity increases the chance of useful access, but it also increases the level of “noise.” And while networking does not require a commitment to a communal domain, it does require maintenance of connections and the ability to distinguish between significance and noise. At the collective level, the strength of networks in enabling serendipity and emergent behaviors has a flipside: the absence of collective intention and identity makes it more difficult to steward a domain systematically. When connections remain largely local important insights can remain hidden because there is no intention to recognize and negotiate their importance through the mobilization of a committed group.


 Model Campus – Mission College

MissionStart

Mission College (Sarah, Marina, and Connor) start their presentation on their campus change.

Mindfulness was a huge part of their practice that they took home. This resulted in personal change, classroom practice change, and institutional change. Through their efforts they developed this equity framework:

MissionEquity

Students are at the table, not on the table.

Through their planning and work, they also narrowed their focus to five goals to impact change on their campus:
MissionGoals


The Golden Circle – Simon Sinek

The goal is to do business with people who believe what you believe.

Groups working on their "golden circles."

Groups working on their “golden circles.”


Model Campus – West LA College – Professional Learning Hub

West LA faculty, Claire and Leslie, discuss the history of WLAC at BSILI and their development of professional learning.

West LA faculty, Claire and Leslie, discuss the history of WLAC at BSILI and their development of professional learning.


Who/What Mapping

Rebecca giving the gospel of how to find who and what you need to accomplish your goals.

Rebecca giving the gospel of how to find who and what you need to accomplish your goals.


Day 1.0 Slides

BSILI2018_Day_1_Mondayv2

Homework

Read (skim) “Mapping Change” article (in binders).

With your campus teammates, create a “Change Narrative” poster that articulates:

  • What do you want to change?
  • What professional learning is needed to support your efforts to make this change?
  • Why is this professional learning critical for that change?

Comments are closed.